Because I Had a Friend in School

May 6, 2015 at 12:17 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , )

If things turned out differently in my life

I might have thought that I’m stupid if someone bullied me when I knew more then him.

I might have thought that I deserve to be punished when I speak agaist a unfair ‘authority’.

I might have thought that I was stupid when I could’t read with eyes that couldn’t see.

I might have thought I deserve to be unhappy if someone didn’t like my looks.

I might have thought I was the only one who didn’t understand a teacher.

I might have thought that if I was unsuccessful once I deserve to stay this way all my life.

A teacher thought my friend theese things.

I know he didn’t deserve any of this. Because he was my friend.

Because I had a friend in school, I know, I will not tolerate such things, even when they will happen to me. Because if they had happened to me then, I might have thought they were true. So thank you my dear friend.

You know, dear teacher, even if you don’t bully me, I still see you. You will wonder why I won’t respect you even when I won’t defy you.

It is because I had a friend in school.

Permalink Leave a Comment

{}

August 19, 2014 at 2:52 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , )

A problem resolves itself in proportion to the quality of its description.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Truth

August 19, 2013 at 8:50 am (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

There always seems to be this ignored, small, trivial problem, that later brings down the whole system (of belief, knowledge). Whether on a personal level or on the level of society.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Politics

June 29, 2013 at 10:58 am (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , )

No transparency, no improvement.

Holds for pretty much everything.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Sheer Lazyness

June 22, 2013 at 10:27 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

Science

The most noble work is that that you will never do again.

Art

The most noble work is that that is never finished. Even after it is finished, people who see it should add to it by their own contemplation and interpretation.

I think there is too much art in science today.

Permalink Leave a Comment

The Enchantment of the Fountain Pen

May 19, 2013 at 8:19 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

The elegance of the fountain pen lies chiefly in its apparent simplicity. Its point, a simple gap in metal, everything else tidily put away in its body.

It is like a drop of ink, transferred to paper by creative thought.

Ink.

It is not in a fountain pen where the writing lies, i realize, nor in the water of the ink.

It is the pigment that shows the word; and in knowing that, the means of transferring it to the page becomes irrelevant.

It does not matter if a diamond is transferred from place to place by bus or plane – its value remains the same.

Be it from fountain pen, pencil or chalk, diluted, old – it is in its nature to color the creativity of man, making it visible to the world.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Questions, Answers, Improvement

December 7, 2012 at 5:00 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

I.
Some books contain questions, some contain answers. Reading one with answers to a person without a question will leave him disappointed. Reading one with questions to a person full of them will make no change.

They will be asking themselves “When does the author shut up already”?

The one is not better then the other. We make use of different kinds at different times in our lives.

Kinda like kids – suddenly a child is all questions; or sometimes they just keep telling and showing you stuff you don’t really care about. They intuitively know how growth, learning and improvement is done. Adults should learn from them.

To often, people push the question kind of book on others, telling them it is art or faith.
To often, people push the answer kind of book on others, telling them it is science.

But they are really not apart from each other: human experience is both art and science – first, it is great to come across a great question; then it is great to come across a great answer. Both are equally needed for us to improve.

II.
If you look at the design of most textbooks, you will see how they try to force this process (which is not bad in itself, since it makes people learn fast). They include both the question, and the answer. If the problem is not specifically posted, the titles are usually actually questions. For example, they will say: Principles of Biochemistry; meaning “What is it, that Biochemistry is based on? What concepts will i find most often in any problem in the field?”.

The many people having problems focusing on their schoolwork (or people who tend to worship “experts” too much) should try this if they don’t do this already – make the title into the question. It may often make the answer more intuitive and easier to learn.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Interior Design

November 26, 2012 at 10:32 pm (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

The way of arranging and aquiring stuff tells of a feeling we would like to re-experience. An opens space feels like freedom, a filled one feels safe. This is because there is nothing worse then experiencing – in terms of emotions – something new. If we do – are we still going back to where we are, or spin into madness?

What you know is what you know you can cope with.

Decoration is simply slavery to our own emotions. As they rule the mind, rationalizations about why we own what we do are becoming an art themselves. There no rational explanation for owning knick-knacks.

Don’t be afraid. Instead of walking around with a duster, you could be walking around with a friend.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Disagreement

June 29, 2012 at 11:08 am (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

What you said sounded wrong, so i took a breath to reply.

But even before the words left my mouth, i realized:

what i was about to say, was exactly the same to what you have just told me.

Permalink Leave a Comment

Leaders, Supply, Demand

April 29, 2012 at 7:46 am (Uncategorized) (, , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , )

It is unlikely that you should ever become rich without opening at least some resemblance of your own company at one time or or another.

Working for someone will nearly always mean you will do tasks the other person does not think worthy of his time to do, and as such needing to pay the worker less then what the employer gets payed.

No matter how ridiculous and low-education the work of what the person above you does, in our world the supply (employers) are not as many as those who want to be employed by them (demand); thus, the work of the employer will most often be worth more as the work of the worker.

When a government takes a lot, or makes a lot of demands on employers (most of rich people are actually in the category) – it is even less likely that the average, low-wage person should start their own company. This is because loosing money when you don’t have it is much worse then loosing the money you don’t mind that much about. Thus at the same risk of succession of a new enterprise, the more that is taken from the rich man, the more likely it is to keep the poor man in his situation.

Less employers means less job options for the employed, making for a vicious cycle of poverty for many people, forcing people to work and not be able to go to another place should the situation become adverse. Thus, high taxes are actually a load put on the worker to carry, regardless on who is taxed on paper.

Sometimes, employers will pay a good amount of money to the worker. This is by no means impossible. But it will often happen, that something will go wrong, and a person in the company will be fired; and you should keep a job you like, but you should also keep this understanding in mind.

Occasionally, with such a thing happening, the employer becomes the enemy. “All they are after is money” is often heard, behind it a person devastated by what just happened.

Personally, i have had a hard time understanding this – would you base your livelihood on a job that is most likely to take money from you, instead of earning you money to buy the groceries? Would you work if you knew you would be payed less than you thought your time deserved? The absolute amount doesn’t matter. Either it feels enough or it doesn’t.

The employers thinking is the same.

Sheep may put blame about their situation on the shepherd. You are men (or women), you have the power to be both the leader of the led.

Partly, i blame today’s lame education systems. Not following is punished since childhood. By the amount of children that break the rules, you may see that leadership is actually as natural to a man as is being a follower. In a world of physical labor, you want the person to follow the leader (teacher); and let the most persistent people (who still refuse to follow) lead in the future. This would be in a world that requires a lot of work, and little thinking.

The problem is, in this system, the amount of people not wanting to follow is considered too high to such a degree, that it is often even considered acceptable to ridicule the person into submission, even if it means the person will completely give up any productivity because of it – possibly ending in drugs, or even suicide. The absurdity of this is in that in the real world, there is actually a lack of people who are willing to lead and risk for a better future.

It should be understood that most education systems still in use in the world today, are designed to produce large amounts of workers and a small percentage of leaders. The sad thing is, many people take this as the ultimate reality – some people are smart, others work for them. This is ludicrous.

Just looking at the curriculum and compare it to what sells in the real world. The education you got in elementary or high school is random and often worthless, so do not base the value of yourself as a person on it.

In the real world, everyone may open up their own enterprise. How good you were in school is completely independent of that (apart of the perception of people that was just described).

Permalink 2 Comments

Next page »